Re: sunscreen and stealth interfaces
Adam Morley <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:52:34 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.sun |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 12:47:39PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to test sunscreen in stealth mode (Solaris 9). > But have warning: > edit> verify > Warning: Stealth Interfaces detected but STEALTH_NET not specified. > Configuration verified successfully (not activated). > edit> save > Saved policy to test version 75 > edit> quit > # ssadm activate test > Warning: Stealth Interfaces detected but STEALTH_NET not specified. > Configuration activated successfully on fdelta. > > Can anybody explain me why the warning is occuring ? You have to define what network the screen (effectively operating as a dumb bridge, by dumb I mean no spanning trees) is "stealthifying": http://docs.sun.com/db/doc/806-6347/6jfa0g877?q=stealth_net&a=view "If the Screen is configured in stealth mode, the network that it partitions and the netmask must be specified. In the configuration editor this is accomplished using the STEALTH_NET #.#.#.# #.#.#.# keyword, where the first #.#.#.# is the network address and the second #.#.#.# is the netmask. In the administration GUI, these parameters are the Stealth Net Address and Stealth Netmask, respectively, in the Miscellaneous tab of the Screen object." http://docs.sun.com/db/doc/806-6347/6jfa0g89n?q=stealth_net&a=view "STEALTH_NET #.#.#.# #.#.#.# {Network and Netmask for stealth type Interfaces} STEALTH_NET #.#.#.#/#.#.#.# STEALTH_NET #.#.#.#/#bits" Also consider the ROUTER option, especially with VPNs. -- adam