Re: GPL license question
Marc Balmer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.virus.clamav.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Patrick, > > You are right. It depends on how you link to clamav. But for this case, It is obvious that "BitMedic" links libclamav internally and ship it on Mac app store. Those guys make money with clamav, it is unfair for clamav development team and community members. I am wondering who is in charge of this issue in clamav team. > It has always been the intention of ClamAV to offer a free and open source solution, and that is what is happening, even with bitmedic. My suggestion would be to review the licensing of client libraries, maybe it would make more sense to license these parts under the LGPL. - mb _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml