Re: libclamav versus clamd
Andreas <andreas-KCZ47A4bww4P48s/[email protected]> Tue, 25 May 2004 18:07:11 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.virus.openantivirus.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 10:32:39PM +0200, Rainer Link wrote: > >To be honest, this sums up the current situation very well. The problem > >is that the unix domain socket is owned by a specific user (i.e. > >"clamav"), but the smbd process are running with various user ids. > > Uups, sorry, I missed the point here. It's not about permissions of the > socket itself but clamd can not access files. Hum. Yes, I was going to point that out when I saw this next post :) Any plans to have this runtime configurable at some point? libclamav vs clamd? I also thought a little about using the STREAM clamd command, but it is marked as obsolete and I'm not sure if performance wouldn't be worse. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click