virus code is never executed - virus or not?
Rainer Link <rainer-pBPPa8WU5k41Tgt60Rntydi2O/[email protected]> Thu, 08 Jan 2004 21:05:07 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.virus.openantivirus.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.reniar.de/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, consider the following scenario. A file contains (part(s)) of viruscode, but the entry point points to the acutal host code. Therefore, the virus code is not being called. What should the virus scanner do? - nothing. As per definition, the virus (code) never replicates, it's not a virus. - report it as a "new/modified variant of <blah>", as the virus code is not complete/modified. - report it as <blah> damaged" (or similar) as it contains virus code but is not functional. - report it as being infected with virus <blah>. As one may change the entry point to the virus code and the virus (still) may work (although I'd say that's very unlike except probably for macro viruses). I personally would vote for do nothing. Is there some common sense/practice for such a case? TIA. best regards, Rainer Link ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html