Re: virus code is never executed - virus or not?
fergus <[email protected]> Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:30:06 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.virus.openantivirus.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 08.01-21:05, Rainer Link wrote: [ snip ] > consider the following scenario. A file contains (part(s)) of viruscode, > but the entry point points to the acutal host code. Therefore, the virus > code is not being called. What should the virus scanner do? [ snip ] i would suggest that any unknown code should be reported - this could include non-viral code in many cases. in this specific example i would tend mark it as a virus, operational or otherwise; because as you stated the possibility of multi-part viruses exists. > I personally would vote for do nothing. Is there some common > sense/practice for such a case? i can think of no reason for that viral code should be propogated through a virus scanner. -- : fergus cameron : [ .] cobbled : : ^^^^^^@cobbled.net : [ ~][ ] .net : ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html