RE: New/recent virus outbreak
"Jackson, Siobhan (ATG)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.virus |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes. And many of the recipient addresses are munged or otherwise invalid addresses that tend to receive a lot of spam. F-Secure's weblog reported "the sample appears to a variant of Mitglieder trojan that is closely related to Bagle. It doesn't have replication mechanism of its own, so it was probably spammed out using some other proxy trojans or a new Bagle worm variant". http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/ Virustotal.com reports that many AV vendors call it a Bagle variant, Symantec calls the trojan Trojan.Tooso.F, and F-Prot calls it Mitglieder. Trend Micro is naming the mass-mailing component WORM_BAGLE.xx, and the dropped trojan TROJ_BAGLE.xx. - Siobhan Siobhan Jackson WA State AG's Office -----Original Message----- From: Dan Denton [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: New/recent virus outbreak Have anyone seen any virus infected emails coming from addresses with usernames identical to those on your own email servers, but from domains like hotmail.com or netzero.com ? These emails seem to be sent from a spoofed email address such as [email protected], and are sent to [email protected]. Also, the attached files are always zip files, and have been named 4.zip, 5.zip, 6.zip, and work.zip . A bounce message from one of our customers suggests they blocked an email from on of our users that was infected with trojan.tooso.F, but the emails stopped don't exhibit those characteristics, And even Symantec's write-up says this virus doesn't send it's own emails. Is it possible there's a beagle variant that is spreading the Tooso trojan as part of it's payload? Thanks in advance. Dan Denton Information Technology Manager, CCNA Pay-LESS Office Products