RE: AV that supports spy/adware
"Evan Mann" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.virus |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <8286ADCC6F238A4AAA8B60E634AC62CE7AF24A@corp-exch1.PINNACLEFINANCIAL.COM> |
No one can comment on how secure the adware/spyware protection that will be offered by the big AV vendors will become. I think it will become on par with the current products out there, in time. It could take a year or more, but I think it will happen. With that in mind, why would you turn down the extra ease of management feature? Yes, layered protection is best, multiple vendors helps give you that, but if I can simple on the desktop end, and use someone else at a gateway level, that's the way I'm going to go. Perhaps my view is skewed as I have over 1200 computers and server to maintain, and I add on about 20 desktops/laptops a month on average. If I only had a few hundred, having to maintain many different products on the desktops wouldn't be as much of a concern. -----Original Message----- From: Steven Hay [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 6:35 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: AV that supports spy/adware We take the opposite view, looking at separation of Adware and AV; also filtering both with layered security. Our logic is not looking at simplicity of management, but maximizing security protection. For the most part the maintenance is low on our filters once they have been set up, but licensing is admittedly more work. We have adware and AV filtering through our gateway, and on the desktop NAV and have plans to use GreenBorder (although this is still in the proposal stage). We're hoping that this approach keeps us reasonably secure against adware (and it's ilk) as well as viruses. We like the Greenborder concept because it runs light and doesn't appear to suffer from zero day or patch weaknesses. -----Original Message----- From: Evan Mann [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: May 5, 2005 1:30 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: AV that supports spy/adware Simplicity of management. Why managed from 2 separate consoles, maintain two different license agreements, etc., when you could do it all from 1 single point. Less software to install on a client, less resources used. Lots of reasons to go down that route. Sure Spysweeper Enterprise and Sunbelt's CounterSpy Enterprise are the two best products out there now, and probably will be for at least anotehr year, but all the major AV vendors will catch up to them and offer equivalent features, and it will make the choice easy for most large companies. -----Original Message----- From: Douglas Schlachta (Sr. Infrastructure Security Analyst) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 2:19 PM To: Dave; [email protected] Subject: RE: AV that supports spy/adware Why would you even want to go down that road. There is an excellent product on the market by WebRoot that is enterprise manageable. They appear to also be one of the main leaders in this area. I would give them a check just to see. IMHO Regards Douglas Schlachta SSCP, MCSE;Security, MCSE, CCNA, CFOT Senior Infrastructure Security Analyst Retirement Residences Operations > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: May 5, 2005 1:00 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: AV that supoprts spy/adware > > Anyone have a list of AV that detects spyware? We are currently using > eTrust with spybot and the MS beta antispyware. I'd like to get > something that's integrated. Thanks. Please note that Internet email is not always private, secure or reliable. The sender accepts no liability for any damages caused by any virus inadvertently transmitted with this email. Any opinion expressed in this email is solely that of the author, unless clearly indicated otherwise. This email, and any attachments, may contain confidential and/or proprietary information that is intended only for use by the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please delete the email and advise the sender of the delivery error.