RE: AV that supports spy/adware
"Douglas Schlachta (Sr. Infrastructure Security Analyst)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.virus |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes Spybot is a good one for the home user. This is also the only place it is meant to be free, if you are using it in a corporate environment then you are going against the ULA. If you pay for the use of it then yes it is a possible solution. Could you point out this new admin suite as I am unable to find it on their site > -----Original Message----- > From: Moritz Naumann [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: May 6, 2005 2:21 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: AV that supports spy/adware > > Douglas Schlachta (Sr. Infrastructure Security Analyst) schrieb: > > Well I beg to disagree. > > > > The track record of most big AV companies has been very poor when it > > comes to there ability to produce a decent product. > > Also the fact that more than likely as in the case of Symantec, you will > > still have multiple licenses you will have to struggle with and will > > also most likely be in a separate console. > > > > For "most large companies" I would rather have a product that works with > > no holes than a second rate product in the same post reactive engine as > > most big AV company products. > > > > IMHO I would rather stick with a product leader than a big name. > > As we're talking of product leaders... > Seen from the desktop view, one of them surely is Spybot Search & > Destroy, which is additionally as cheap as it gets: Freeware. > > Safer Networking, its vendor, has recently developed an administration > suite, too. This is not free, but still very cheap, and may be a good > choice for those who do not mind having to manage seperate AV and > Anti-Adware solutions, even more so if equipped with a limited budget > and still look for a hard to beat solution (if combined with an > infrastructually suited Antivirus solution). > > http://www.safer-networking.ie/