RE: Do we still need scheduled scan?

I recommend it. It's possible that a workstation could be infected prior
to the release of an update that includes that virus signature. I've
noticed that the real-time scan will sometimes not detect what's present
on the file system without a full disk scan.

Some real-time scans can be throttled down to use only a percent of
available resources, i.e. processor and disk time, so the scan could
goes unnoticed by the end user. Without this, the virus software will
often utilize nearly 90% of available resources, and that's what will
slow the system down. I believe McAfee has this feature.

jared

-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Fox [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 5:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Do we still need scheduled scan?

If we have already implemented virus scan at the gateway, on the mail 
server, on individual servers, and real time scan on
workstations/laptops, 
do we still need scheduled, e.g., weekly, scan on workstations and
laptops 
as well as servers?

Schdeuled scans really slow down some machines.

Any comments are appreciated.

Thanks,

Doug