Re: Extracting signature snippets from AV databases
Nick FitzGerald <[email protected]> Wed, 10 May 2006 10:53:30 +1200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.virus |
|---|---|
| Organization | Personal account |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yuri Slobodyanyuk wrote: > SideNote: few years ago I watched the heated dabate on some forum (don't > remember any details) where AV vendor representative was accusing > open-source AV developers of reverse-engineering the virus-signatures > instead of gathering their own, so logic > says it has been done before by someone. Yes -- the Open AntiVirus group had a "signature extractor" that basically took a sample of a piece of malware detected by a scanner then successively munged it (overwriting various sized and location blocks with nulls IIRC) until the scanner didn't detect it. Applying this approach from several starting points and iterating eventually gives you a suitably small-ish "chunk" of the original file that appears necessary to its detection, at least relative to the specific scanner in the harness. Said "chunk" was then added to OAV's detection database. For a dumb, brute-force string scanner like OAV's and for some simple types of malware this can produce marginally useful "signatures", if detection of relatively static objects (such as non-morphing malware, which includes most self-mailers) is your objective. It is probably even a defensible business model if you have no ethics. However, taking such a "signature" and sticking it into an arbitrary file at an arbitrary offset (as the OP is apparently planning on doing) is not even guaranteed to trigger the original scanner such a "signature" was extracted from, for reasons I mentioned in my earlier post and also described by Robert Sandilands. That the OP was apparently unaware of these basic issues and limitations of his proposed approach is rather worrying, given he is the developer of a security product. -- Nick FitzGerald Computer Virus Consulting Ltd. Ph/FAX: +64 3 3267092