RE: Symantec AV reporting metrics.

"Howe, Paul H" <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:57:57 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.virus
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hmmm... If your management does not trust the patch fro 10.1, why do they trust the patch for 8.1?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge Vondandamo [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 1:15 AM
> To: 'Ted Senn'
> Cc: [email protected]; 'sekure'
> Subject: RE: Symantec AV reporting metrics.
> 
> 
> I forgot to add that,
> 
> I have up to 6000 Clients located WW (Europe, Americas, APAC, 
> and Middle-east).
> 
> Thanks,
> Serge
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Serge Vondandamo [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Envoyé : dimanche 18 juin 2006 08:11
> À : 'Ted Senn'
> Cc : '[email protected]'; 'sekure'
> Objet : RE: Symantec AV reporting metrics.
> 
> All,
> 
> Thank you for your pointers.
> 
> I have tried the manual process but it doesn't give good 
> metrics for my audience (CTO, CSO, CIOs, IT Managers).
> 
> I have tried to convince IT folks to upgrade to 10.1 so I can 
> use the reporting module but no one want to upgrade to a 
> vulnerable version of the AV.
> 
> They don't believe in the patch provided by Symantec since I 
> am not able to test it and provide a technical report - patch 
> the app and try to exploit the vulnerability and report.
> 
> Please, could you help me on the following?
> 
> 1. Do you have a screenshot of the reporting module? Graphs, 
> type of metrics it can provide, etc?
> 
> 2. Do you know how I can patch 10.1 and test the 
> effectiveness of the patch?
> 
> Thanks,
> Serge
> 
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Ted Senn [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Envoyé : vendredi 9 juin 2006 15:58
> À : [email protected]
> Cc : [email protected]; 'sekure'
> Objet : RE: Symantec AV reporting metrics.
> 
> Installing the reporting server is the start.  Unless you 
> have a small number of clients I would recommend a separate 
> system. The reporting server is somewhat CPU intensive in my 
> experience.
> 
> Each AV server will need to have reporting agents installed 
> on them. However for testing you can set up the reporting 
> server and only those AV servers that you want to test with 
> would need the reporting agents installed. You will need the 
> SAV 10.1 SSC to configure the agents
> 
> Yes 10.1 needs to be maintenance patched to 10.1.0.400 and 
> point patched to 10.1.0.401
> 
> 
> Ted Senn
> Security Engineer
> Distributed Security
> 847-605-6837
>  
> 
>                       "Serge Vondandamo"
> 
>                       <serge.vondandamo@         To:      "'Ted Senn'"
> <[email protected]>                                
>                       wanadoo.fr>                cc:
> <[email protected]>, "'sekure'" <[email protected]>      
>                                                  Subject: RE: 
> Symantec AV
> reporting metrics.                                  
>                       06/08/2006 09:26
> 
>                       PM
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks Ted,
> 
> If I understand, I just need to install the 10.1 and the 
> reporting server in one of my primary and that is it?
> 
> Is there any eval version of it? I will like to test it on my 
> lab first. BTW, is the 10.1 affected by the recent Symantec 
> products vulnerability?
> 
> Thanks,
> Serge
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Ted Senn [mailto:[email protected]]
> Envoyé : mardi 6 juin 2006 14:24
> À : [email protected]
> Cc : [email protected]; 'sekure'
> Objet : RE: Symantec AV reporting metrics.
> 
> I am running Reporting server without any problem on version 
> 10, and 9 servers.  The agent installs and reports back to 
> the reporting server. You may need a special group with 10.1 
> for the reporting server only, but the reporting will work 
> with the lower version AV servers ( agent will not install on 
> NT systems)
> 
> 
> Ted Senn
> Distributed Security
> 
> 
>                       "Serge Vondandamo"
> 
>                       <serge.vondandamo@         To:      "'sekure'"
> <[email protected]>
>                       wanadoo.fr>                cc:
> <[email protected]>
>                                                  Subject: RE: 
> Symantec AV reporting metrics.
>                       06/05/2006 03:30
> 
>                       PM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sekure and all,
> 
> Thanks but we don't have version 10.1 and unfortunately, I 
> have to find a way to report with the versions we have. I may 
> suggest to upgrade but that will not be possible now - IT Ops 
> folks and other IS Managers will be difficult to convince - 
> given the heavy IT Governance and change process we have in place.
> 
> We currently have version 8 in few sites, version 9 and 10 in 
> the majority of the sites.
> 
> Paul, your pointers are more than welcome!!!
> 
> Thanks,
> Serge
> 
> 
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : sekure [mailto:[email protected]]
> Envoyé : lundi 5 juin 2006 20:51
> À : Serge Vondandamo
> Cc : [email protected]
> Objet : Re: Symantec AV reporting metrics.
> 
> Symantec Corp AV 10.1 has a reporting server module, which 
> provides pretty pictures for lots of these metrics.
> 
> On 6/3/06, Serge Vondandamo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I have been tasked to develop Symantec AV reporting metrics. The 
> > metrics should help provide visual information (graphs, tables, etc)
> to
> > Senior management on weekly, monthly, quarterly and annual basis per
> region
> > and WW if needed.
> >
> > I am focusing on providing the followings:
> >
> > - Number of AV clients per region,
> > - Number of AV engines, versions, per region,
> > - Information on AV defs per region, frequency of updates, 
> versions of 
> > AV definitions, age of AV definitions (i.e. two weeks old, 
> two months 
> > old,
> very
> > old, etc).
> > - Status of AV clients per region - i.e. auto-protect enabled or
> disabled,
> > threat found, old definitions, etc.
> > - Any other information that will be useful for big boss not 
> > interested
> on
> > technical data.
> >
> >
> > I am looking for pointers, idea and suggestion from those who have
> already
> > done so; I will not try to re-invent the wheel ;)
> >
> > Thanks for your inputs.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Serge Vondandamo, HND, CISSP, CCNA.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ******************* PLEASE NOTE *******************
> This E-Mail/telefax message and any documents accompanying 
> this transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential 
> information and is intended solely for the addressee(s) named 
> above.  If you are not the intended addressee/recipient, you 
> are hereby notified that any use of, disclosure, copying, 
> distribution, or reliance on the contents of this 
> E-Mail/telefax information is strictly prohibited and may 
> result in legal action against you. Please reply to the 
> sender advising of the error in transmission and immediately 
> delete/destroy the message and any accompanying documents.  Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>