RE: IPSEC over UDP or TCP

Thats interesting. I assumed a higher overhead for
obvious reasons. Can you point to any studies or white
papers proving that NAT-T doesn't affect performance??

Thanks,

Siddhartha



 --- Bill Yazji <[email protected]> wrote: > Quantify
your "con" - significant testing has shown
> this really isn't the
> case....
> 
> ~B
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
>
[mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of
> Siddhartha Jain
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11:45 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [VPN] IPSEC over UDP or TCP
> 
> 
> Advantages: Beats ISP blocking of IPSec traffic and
> overcomes NAT difficulties.
> 
> Cons: Decreases throughput because you have higher
> overheads. Original packet inside IPSec inside
> TCP/UDP
> packet.
> 
> 
> 
>  --- "Shivdasani, Meenoo"
> <[email protected]> wrote: >
> > I'm interested in people's experiences with
> > implementing IPSEC over UDP
> > or TCP.
> >
> > Benefits?  Disadvantages?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > M
> > _______________________________________________
> > VPN mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/vpn
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
> Want to chat instantly with your online friends? 
> Get the FREE Yahoo!
> Messenger http://mail.messenger.yahoo.co.uk
> _______________________________________________
> VPN mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/vpn
> 
> _______________________________________________
> VPN mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/vpn 

________________________________________________________________________
Want to chat instantly with your online friends?  Get the FREE Yahoo!
Messenger http://mail.messenger.yahoo.co.uk