Re: VPN tunnel between 2 Cisco 1721 Routers
Eric Vyncke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.vpn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5.1.0.14.2.20031115210504.05fe0c08@localhost> |
You should browse on the Cisco web site to find some examples... Notably: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a008009448f.shtml If you have multiple subnets behind those routers, you should probably use the combination of GRE & IPsec (aka 'tunnel protection'). Else, 'plain' IPsec should be enough. To bypass NAT for encrypted traffic, you need to use a trick called 'route-map': ip nat inside source route-map NO_NAT interface ??? overload route-map NO_NAT permit 10 match ip address 100 access-list 100 deny ip 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.2.2.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 100 permit ip 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any Assuming that the encrypted traffic is from 10.1.1.0/24 to 10.2.2.0/24 -eric At 16:41 12/11/2003 -0600, Glenda Pratts wrote: >Hello, > >I am trying to set up an IPSec tunnel between two Cisco 1721 routers (with >VPN modules installed) between two networks using private IP addresses. Both >routers are connected to the internet via a fractional T1, and are running >Cisco IOS version 12.2(13). I would like to set up encryption for all data >sent through the tunnel, and use NAT for all traffic not sent through the >tunnel. Any assistance configuring the VPN and the NAT is greatly >appreciated. > >Thanks, > >Glenda Pratts >System Administrator >Valve Systems and Controls >501 W. 38th Street >Houston, Texas 77018 >713.742.1015 (direct) >713.742.1010 (fax) > > >_______________________________________________ >VPN mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/vpn _______________________________________________ VPN mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/vpn