RE: VNC over VPN, security considerations?
Andy Mason <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.vpn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <90C57CF4C8A94B4FA38189634204B25C04926B@EXCHANGE-SERVER> |
As usual, the answer is: It depends. In this case, mostly on how paranoid you are. If you trust the non-VPN parts of the communication path, then you probably don't need to worry much more about it. Here's what the FAQ has to say about it: http://www.uk.research.att.com/archive/vnc/faq.html#q55 <http://www.uk.research.att.com/archive/vnc/faq.html#q55> I run VNC over an SSH connection (that requires RSA keypair login) and I sleep well at night. Andy -----Original Message----- From: Galeotos, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 12:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [VPN] VNC over VPN, security considerations? Hello, Well again normally I just sit back and read what you all have to say, but I've got another question. For the most part our VPN is up and functional without anything more for me to do except load the cisco client software on to the machines of the converts. Recently however I have been looking at uses I could have for the VPN aside from answering my Emails on my days off. One of the software products I use on occasion is VNC for remote control access and installs of patches, and the like. It looks as if when I do a search for ports and VNC I get as many hits telling me that ports 5800 and 5900+display# are the ones used as I get "VNC port firewall, viren, hackertools, and exploits." This does not give me a warm fuzzy about opening those ports so that I could use VNC over the VPN. So my question is simply: "What are the considerations and mitigating steps that I could take if we decided to open these ports up? Or...is it simply a very bad idea? Thanks for your time. I'll go back to reading for the most part again. John Galeotos _______________________________________________ VPN mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/vpn