Re: possible connection choices
"Dave Howe" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.vpn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mulugeta Shiferaw wrote: > -all offices use dial-up connection (to the head office and > then...?) to the internet nothing wrong with that, provided it is for only occasional use. long distance Dialup is expensive per-minute though (and a poor way to gain connection to the internet. it might be worth getting (say) DSL or cable to the internet, but keeping dialup for low-usage data transfer, or investigating a leased-line between the sites. > -each office to have a leased-line connection to the internet also possible- or simply DSL/cable. a lot depends on how much traffic you expect your remote offices to carry, and how much of it needs to get to the head office. There are also security implications - you may not wish your branch offices to have direct links to the internet, even for VPN use only. If you contact your ISP they may well offer you a non-internet package deal which is significantly cheaper than the internet one (we were offered one in the uk where we were on effectively a private vlan; no direct internet connection, RFC1918 ips (class C per location) and 512+512 (symmetric) DSL. If you decide to go the VPN route, then you can *still* use dialup - as long as you don't get allocated a Dynamic IP (and under some circumstances, even if you are) - Just dial your ISP, establish tunnel, do what needs to be done, and drop the tunnel (and the link) I won't bother with the diagram - it will either have the "internet cloud" with branches and head office as leaves, or the "telephone network" cloud ditto :)