RE: Not another NAT question.. Yes I'm Sorry

"Neo" <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Jul 2004 13:05:37 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.vpn
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hey CS, I see this in the logs. Your right, each computer does use UDP 500
for outbound and inbound ports. Below shows when one user connected to the
VPN and then I had another use connect. NOTE: the source addresses below are
actual addresses. My client was set up with these as their private IP's. I
realize they are public. I did not do this. Was done before my time. Maybe
that has something to do with things not working? I replaced the Dest.
address for security purposes.

The router has two sections under VPN, one being IKE Policies and the other
is VPN policies. Maybe something can be configured under those sections ,
which would allow this to work?

[Tue, 2004-07-13 11:45:06] - UDP Packet - Source:201.1.1.16,500 ,LAN -
Destination:1.2.3.4,500 ,WAN [Forward] - [Outbound Default rule match]

[Tue, 2004-07-13 11:47:31] - UDP Packet - Source:201.1.1.96,500 ,LAN -
Destination:1.2.3.4,500 ,WAN [Forward] - [Outbound Default rule match]

Joseph Brochu
Network Administrator
Transportation Resources, Inc.
978-422-7770  x303




-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
Clinton Sigmon
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 5:39 PM
To: Neo
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [VPN] Not another NAT question.. Yes I'm Sorry


Does the Netgear support more than one IPSEC device behind it??
check the docs.

i know the old RT311 did not.

in my previous experience this what i have seen happen in a working
environment.

the NAT'd IPSec client uses UDP-E, basically an ESP packet with a UDP
header with a source and dest port of 500 (IKE). usually the NAT device
will modify the source port as it processes the packet, what cisco likes
to call PAT ( port address translation ).  when it is passed out the
public side it will have source port > 1024 and dest port of 500.

for example

[NATclientIPSEC] ---> udp(src=500&dst=500) ---> {NAT-Router)
->udp(src=>1024&dst=500)

sorry for terrible drawing.

this is to help NAT table map the packet back to the private address.

your netgear device might not being modifying the source port which in
turn would allow only 1 ipsec device to talk to a single termination
point.

i would love to look at a network capture ( any format ), just take out
relevant IP info.

i hope i am on the right track and this helps.  also look into firmware
upgrades and documentation on the Netgear, if any available.


cs



Neo wrote:
> I have a client using a Netgear FVS328 VPN Router.
>
> Runs NAT.
>
> The internal workstations use Netscreen Remote VPN client. I cannot get
> more than one workstation connected at a time. If a user  is in and
> another connects, the new user boots out the existing user and now that
> user is in.
>
> I am trying to understand somethings by reading but if someone could
> help me out I would very much appreciate it.
>
> What I would like to know is, can this router or the VPN client somehow
> get around this obvious limitation. NAT Traversal?
>
> If I have left out any needed info let me know.
>
> //
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> VPN mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/vpn

_______________________________________________
VPN mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/vpn