Re: Universal VPN client
"Dana J. Dawson" <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Jul 2004 12:26:47 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.vpn |
|---|---|
| Organization | Qwest Communications, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I keep hearing that SSL VPN's are better because they avoid the administrative issues and scaling limitations with IPSec clients, but I don't buy it. Most IPSec clients today can be easily preconfigured, and if I can set up an accessible web server for SSL VPN clients, then I can also make my preconfigured client available to my users (assuming I don't already have a method of distributing software to clients, but most large organizations already have that). Also, I've had more compatibility issues with Java-based apps than I've had with VPN clients, what with different supported browsers and different versions of JRE required. SSL VPN's are fine if they fit your requirements, but they do not appear to me to be a complete substitute for a more general purpose IPSec VPN client solution. Just my $.02 Dana Dana J. Dawson [email protected] Sr. Staff Engineer CCIE #1937 Qwest Communications (612) 664-3364 600 Stinson Blvd., Suite 1S (612) 664-4778 (FAX) Minneapolis MN 55413-2620 "Hard is where the money is." > On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 01:32:07AM -0700, Doug Dooley wrote: > >>Just curious - why would you want to deal with the headaches of full client software configuration + management, all the various NAT traversal problems, and Proxy conflict issues associated with legacy Layer 3 tunneling clients (L2TP, PPTP, IPSec)? >> >> >> >>SSL VPN devices provide "anytime anywhere" access in three forms: >> >>- Pure clientless (web-based) - Internet caf?, kiosk, PDA, cell phone, anything with a first-class SSL enabled browser >> >>- Semi clientless (client/server app support) via Java Applet or ActiveX/Win32 >> >>- Full Layer 3 access (windows network adapter over SSL) >> >> >> >>No client software installation/configuration/management, No NAT traversal problems, No proxy conflicts. >> >>Sorry for the pitch but just thinking - right tool for the right job? >> >> >> >>Maybe I'm missing something? >> >> >> >>If cap-ex cost of the appliance is the issue, there are cost-effective choices out there. >> >>Just wait a couple of weeks when Juniper announces an extremely cost effective SSL VPN appliance that will resonant with those price-sensitive folks. >> >> >> >>Your thoughts... >> >> >> >>Doug Dooley >>Security Products Group >>Technical Marketing, Manager