Re: Can IPSec ESP be nested in another ESP?
Travis Watson <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:33:22 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.vpn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Son, I know that Checkpoint was talking about having an ability like that with their client (encrypt/decrypt/then automatically re-encrypt by policy), but I don't know if they have implemented it. It seems like you could have people use their IPSec client through a b2b tunnel easily enough though. So: Users ------> firewall <--------IPSEC tunnel------->firewall------>application server---------->target app |---Site A------------| <-------- Internet ---------->| <------- Site B-----------------------------------| Users w/IPSec client -----------------------------------------------| terminate client tunnel --> hit target app The users would ride the b2b tunnel through to the application server. It seems a little bit like overkill though. I don't know your specific situation, but you could just as easily have a firewall rule allowing IPSec clients in to your application server. Good luck! --Travis Son Phan wrote: >Hello, > >I understand that AH & ESP mode can be applied together for the same >IP packet. > >However I don't know whether two ESP can be nested. The case is as >below: > >PC-------------------------------VPN GW-------------Application Server (AS) ><<------ESP tunnel mode----->> ><<-------------ESP transport mode ------------------->> > >PC has remote access to some closed domain using via VPN GW. ESP >tunnel mode is used here. >One of the application running on this PC want to use a service provided >by an AS within this closed domain. However this service mandates the >client to use ESP transmode mode to contact it. > >Can this scenario works? >Any extra requirement toward the IPSec implementation on PC? > >Thanks, Son > >_______________________________________________ >VPN mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/vpn > > > >