VPN layout question
Chris Dahms <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:11:30 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.vpn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I work for a small doctors office that has three locations across long island and we are looking to overhaul our network connection in conjunction with upgrading our practice management software. Currently we have a 'vpn' of sorts setup by point to point frame relay from two of the offices to the main office. The hardware 8+ years old and failing, so we need to replace everything. The network needs to provide secure communication between all three offices. The practice management software we uses resides on one server at our main location, and needs to be able to securely communicate with the other two offices. My question is with regard to the network toplogy. I was under the impression we could get a T1 to each site, buy cisco 2600 series routers for each office with a VPN module card, and set it up so that office 1 was on say 192.168.1.x, office 2 on 192.168.3.x and office 3 on 192.168.4.x and then when office 1 wanted to communicate with office 2, the packets from office 1 would be encrypted and routed by the vpn module over to the router at office 2 and sent to the appropriate machine. Then as a backup we could have dsl at each location hooked into the router, and if the t1 when down it would fail over to the dsl. The network consultants we contract with are recommending point to point t1's from each smaller office to the main office with the network server, and then having each office have a seperate t1 for an internet connection, in addition to the dsl failover. When I asked about the design I had in mind, they replied it was unsecure/unreliable but failed to explain why. My question is: is the network toplogy I have in mind feasible/reliable, or do we need point to point internet connections between the offices to establish the vpn ? thanks, chris