Re: IPSec tunnel failover

[email protected] wrote:

>VPN Wizards,
>I have been  tasked to configure IPSec tunnels from a remote site (1751 w/Cisco Secure IOS)  terminating on 2 different Nokia IP380 firewalls. The customer is requesting that the traffic be divided into the tunnels by certain traffic type. One tunnel will transport SAP, terminating on 1 firewall and the other tunnel will transport e-mail, miscelleanous traffic,terminating on the other firewall. They also are requesting that in the event that one tunnel fails the traffic of the failed tunnel be automatically re-routed to the other available tunnel.
>Can anyone let me know if this is feasible and how it is done. Do I need additional hardware or sofware to resolve this request?
>
>Thanks,
>
>al
>_______________________________________________
>VPN mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/vpn
>
>
>  
>
Not really, no.  You could do it, conceivably, it you got firewall load 
balancers to put in front and behind to handle the failover, but that 
would be a waste of time and money (lots of both).  It seems better to 
use QOS. 

It sounds like their crack rock is SAP and everyone else be damned, so 
guarantee SAP xMB of traffic (or negate it by limiting everything else 
to xMB).  If they want failover, the two firewalls have to work 
together, with the same policy.

--Travis