Re: fw1 site to site vpn subnet conflict
"Smith, Duane" <[email protected]> Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:01:40 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.vpn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We have a similar configuration involving a datacenter that wanted us to interface with servers in a 10.x network. I don't see why you can't use the nat'ing solution in both directions. They set the nat'ing rule up on their end and we connect to them just fine. They had to add an IP address from a different 10.y subnet to a few of their servers and nat the 10.y so that the nat rule would not apply to other integrations where the 10.x was already in production. In short: why is you nat rule "directional"? drs -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Livingston Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 8:32 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [VPN] Re: fw1 site to site vpn subnet conflict I take it that it would be too much to change either your private network subnet or the subnet on the other end which conflicts with yours? I think that's going to be the only thing you can do in this case. If the individual devices on the remote end don't need access to the rest of their network, you can try changing their default gateway to the IP address of the VPN endpoint on the remote side and that should allow their traffic to pass through the VPN correctly, but they won't be able to access the other network subnets on their own side. Maybe someone else have other ideas but I think you'll have to change one side or the other in order to make this work properly. Undrhil ----- Original Message ----- From: "zoe" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 11:30 AM Subject: [VPN] fw1 site to site vpn subnet conflict > Hi > > I have a site to site vpn with a client (fw1 at each end). I only have one > private subnet behind my firewall but my client has many and > one of these conflicts with mine. > Initially I only needed this connection to work one way (us --> them) so I > put a manual nat rule in place which hide nats my /24 behind > a different private /24 for connections to the client. This works fine > > Now I have been asked to enable inbound traffic to certain hosts from the > client (them --> us). They can't use the real addresses of my > hosts as they would be routed to their own network. Any suggestions on how > this can be done (if at all)? I have tried a few things including adding > static nat inbound to the few hosts they need to access but have had no > success. I can post more config if anyone thinks they can help > > Thanks > > Zoe > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- ----- > _______________________________________________ > VPN mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/vpn _______________________________________________ VPN mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/vpn