RE: Zebedee Analysis
"William Hazelrig" <[email protected]> Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:24:30 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.zebedee.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000001c420d4$8c656f70$6563a8c0@HelpdeskTest> |
If you implement identity checking, Zebedee 2.4.1 is not subject to man-in-the-middle attacks. See the Identity Checking section of the Zebedee manual: http://www.winton.org.uk/zebedee/manual.html - w.h. -----Original Message----- From: zebedee-talk-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org [mailto:zebedee-talk-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Yves Smolders Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 1:31 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Zebedee-talk] Zebedee Analysis Hi guys, A client where I want to implement ZBD as VPN is worried about the security of the protocol. I've found some links about blowfish & diffie-helmann, but not an analysis of ZBD itself. I know 2.4.1 has issues with man-in-the-middle attacks, but I believe 2.5.x solves this with the contect checking (against replay attacks?) Is there any independent analysis out there, like there used to be for vtunnel? Thanks, Yves ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click