[ php-blog-Bugs-1460986 ] Referrer handling broken
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.serendipity.trackers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bugs item #1460986, was opened at 2006-03-29 23:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by flotsam You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=542822&aid=1460986&group_id=75065 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Administrative functions Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 1 Submitted By: John Goerzen (jgoerzen) Assigned to: Garvin Hicking (garvinhicking) Summary: Referrer handling broken Initial Comment: Hello, I have just switched my blog at http://changelog.complete.org/ over to S9Y. I've noticed that only one referrer was appearing in the Statistics screen. After investigation, I found that indeed only one referrer (a hit from a google search) was in the referrers table. I followed inbound links to my blog -- both the homepage and various stories -- from different sources. Still nothing showed up in that table. A little digging revealed this thread: http://www.s9y.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4074&highlight=referrer I checked the suppress table, and sure enough, 12 rows. Now I have some comments about that. First, referrers are never presented to the public on my site, so I don't care about referrer spam at all. Secondly, a lot of legitimate hits visit the site only once in a week or whatever, and I'd like to know about them. Third, I intentionally hit the site several times from some of these places, with a single IP, within a few minutes, and still no referrer showed up. winkiller on IRC was able to confirm the bug on 1.0beta2 but believed it does not exist in SVN trunk. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: flotsam (flotsam) Date: 2006-03-30 16:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1302710 I agree, something must be broken - I set up a special page on another domain and followed a link to this blog an dmy own installation of beta2 and got no referrers at all. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Goerzen (jgoerzen) Date: 2006-03-30 16:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=491567 I understand, but what I'm trying to say is that this blocks a lot of legitimate referrers, and I don't care about the spam. I get a lot of one-off hits from various google searches, etc. It would be nice to at least have a togglable option to disable the referrer blocking. Better yet -- how about making the referrer filtering a plugin that could be removed at will? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Garvin Hicking (garvinhicking) Date: 2006-03-30 11:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=473563 In fact this is not a bug, but intentional prevention of referrer spamming from a single IP. The suppress list only shows a referrer if it comes at least 2 times for a different IP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=542822&aid=1460986&group_id=75065 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642