Re: Missing close parenthesis on page 117 of reference manual

Chet Ramey <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.shells.bash.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2/3/26 10:17 AM, Anselm Schüler wrote:
> That’s what I meant with my question, is it the same sources as the actual 
> bash binary?

I feel like we're talking past each other. I assume what you mean by `the
actual bash binary' is whatever you get from your vendor. That's probably
built from the bash-5.3 release, which is the `master' branch. You asked
for `in-development documentation', and that's in the devel branch.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    [email protected]    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.