Re: [PATHC] Fix handling of reversed slices in assignstrvalue

>
> Thanks, that makes sense. I guess this is somewhat an argument to keep
> the first hunk too, it's more of a statement that v->end is < zlen,
>

Although, now that the else if is gone, the same is expressed by the last
test, i.e., the first hunk kind of becomes doubly redundant.

Another reason I removed it is because it's not present in the equivalent
code for arrays in setarrvalue
<https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh/blob/e73499b372c398c1043b12955c3b3e7602b1a992/Src/params.c#L2939-L2955>.
In workers/54348 <http://zsh.org/workers/54348>, I unify the code for
strings and arrays. If you keep the first hunk, I might add an equivalent
one for arrays in that patch.

Philippe