Re: [PATCH] Restrict named directories to scalar parameters.
Bart Schaefer <[email protected]> Sat, 13 Jun 2026 13:05:47 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.shells.zsh.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAH+w=7aHe64BUd6BMa7nbEnRXWEvTeSshUXZka+n_dA4DfvNBw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 12:41 PM Philippe Altherr <[email protected]> wrote: > > - Restrict named directories to scalar parameters Aside: I suggest adding PS1="" to the input of zsh -fis for the Test/K01 patch. I tried running the test for this without the accompanying patch to params.c. --- expected +++ actual @@ -4,5 +4,5 @@ nameddirs=( v1 /A ) nameddirs=( v1 /A v2 /2 r2 /R ) nameddirs=( v1 /A r2 /R ) -nameddirs=( v1 /A r2 /R ) -nameddirs=( v1 /A v2 /B r2 /R ) +nameddirs=( v1 /A ) +nameddirs=( v1 /A v2 /B ) Running the test standalone with -fvxis, the expected result diverges here: echo "nameddirs=( ${(kv)nameddirs} )" +Src/zsh:13> echo 'nameddirs=( v1 /A r2 /R )' nameddirs=( v1 /A r2 /R ) r2=v2 +Src/zsh:14> r2=v2 That's initialized the placeholder nameref r2 with the name v2. The test asserts autonamedirs should not remove the previous forced entry r2=/R from the named directory table, because r2 is not a plain scalar? If that's what you mean, then that's what the description of the patch should be, because as far as I can tell all the other cases of "named directory is not a scalar parameter" are handled by adduserdir(). If you have a simple case of ~name or autonamedirs stuffing a non-scalar into the table, please provide it. I'm on the proverbial fence over whether the existing behavior demonstrated by the test is in fact wrong.