Re: List of pending patches

Thanks, this is helpful, I try to flag them but sometimes lose track.
Selected notes ...

On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 4:26 PM Philippe Altherr
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> - More readable parameter definitions in params.c - workers/55022
>   Only rename/refactor macros, no code change

Anyone have comments on this?  It's a bit like a patch that cleans up
indentation in that it makes sense on its own but puts a crimp in
tracing changes from before it to after it.

> - The substitution flags (v!) are forbidden, also forbid (!v) - workers/54940

This one seems semantically OK but reading the diff leaves me
searching for something *else* that *ceases to be* an error.  Did an
earlier patch change something related?

> - Don't map ksh's ! to Zsh's (!k), map it to (k) - workers/55047
>   Maybe controversial

That one says "DO NOT COMMIT" so I haven't considered doing so.  The
only controversial bit for me is the part where ${!nameref} doesn't
act like ksh any more; I have no objection to ${!hash} or
${!hash[key]} working like (k) when namerefs aren't involved.

> - Restrict named directories to scalar parameters set to a path - workers/54760
>   Maybe controversial

I don't think I ever got an answer to my question at the end of
workers/54779?  The thread veered down the path of replacing
workers/54759 with workers/54792

> The following two are rather simple but the first one has a trivial merge conflict (because a committed patch already added "for, " in an error message about loops).
>
> - Forbid break/continue in subshells - workers/55061
> - Forbid escaping past all enclosing loops in the same subshell - workers/55061
>   Maybe controversial

I don't have a strong opinion on this ... I have the impression that
"break N" for a large N may have been used somewhere to escape from a
stack of nested loops, possibly to force a function call stack to
unwind, so I'm uncertain about making this case an error.

> The following should probably wait after the work on inline assignments (and localized special parameters):
>
> - Don't export hidden parameters - workers/54987
> - In inline assignments, assign the reference, not its referent - workers/54944

Agree these should be folded into whatever comes of the "language
design" threads.