Re: psychiatric help
Aaron Schrab <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Apr 2026 19:57:50 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.shells.zsh.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 11:18 -0700 05 Apr 2026, Ray Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: >On 2026-04-05 10:39, Mark J. Reed wrote: >>> >>If its output is not going to a terminal, you get the "polite" >>behavior that outputs one filename per line. Any time you're doing >>`ls |` or `$(ls)` or `<(ls)`, the output is not going to a terminal, >>so you get the one-per-line behavior. >So if 'ls' is called within a function that counts as 'not a >terminal'? Man ... so easy to draw the wrong conclusion. As above, I >thought it was the array causing that. No. Unless the function definition directs the output elsewhere, the output of ls (or any other command) in a function goes wherever the output of the function goes. If you're starting from a terminal there can be essentially unlimited levels of scripts or other commands, aliases, or functions between the terminal and the ls execution with the output still going to a terminal as long as nothing directed the output to go somewhere else.