FederationTerminationNotification without signature not accepted

[email protected] Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:30:26 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.sourceid.sso.user
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Hi

The spec "Liberty Protocols and Schema Specification 1.1", chapter 3.4.1,
says: "The <FederationTerminationNotification> message SHOULD be signed."
My interpretation is that the signature is optional. However, it seems th=
at
Sourceid.java version 1.1 (and also 1.2?) treats it as mandatory, right?
Is this a bug? I'm using a liberty implementation which does not sign thi=
s
message.

regards, Peter