Re: Follow up FPOTYP on KFP

Rob Berendt <[email protected]> Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:06:59 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.systems.as400.bpcs
Message-ID <DM6PR11MB3193BAE382B8CA9A8E08DE9CA49F0@DM6PR11MB3193.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
A Field Reference File wouldn't help in the least, for this situation.

You might be down to browsing the source, as I did for that field and showed that one example.

-----Original Message-----
From: BPCS-L <[email protected]> On Behalf Of George Varvaressos
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2019 2:28 AM
To: bpcs-l-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] Follow up FPOTYP on KFP


Thanks Rob, I can spell, it's my typing that fails me.
We tried to explain to Roger Covey the elegance and benefits of a field reference file but just got a blank stare. One of many.
Otherwise we wouldn't have one file with two fields described as Order Type. Just trying to work out how, when and where firm planned orders are turned in into POs and SOs.
Thanks. you are one of the few who always reply.


-- 
This is the BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: [email protected]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

-- 
This is the BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: [email protected]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.