Re: Inv transfer Question.

Dale Gindlesperger <dale_gindlesperger-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.systems.as400.mapics
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Well, we didn't use the I/M-G/L interface because Fleetwood Corporate required 
specific methods for tracking costs, so we had to write our own after we turned 
off the I/M and COM/CSM interfaces.  However, unless I totally misunderstood how 
the G/L posting worked (which is quite possible), if you have separate ITMRVx 
records and ITEMBL records between the two sites, I thought the IW and RW 
postings pulled the data from their respective warehouse records.  I'm not sure 
how the difference in costs would be posted, however, since I didn't have to 
track it that way.  


If you have to manually apply differences in cost, have you considered using the 
CA transaction immediately following the TW?  That might work....

 Dale (Cork) Gindlesperger, CPIM 
Click here for my professional profile






________________________________
From: Jeff Snyder <[email protected]>
To: mapics midrange <mapics-l-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, April 26, 2011 12:06:27 PM
Subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] Inv transfer Question.


Dale,  I get that.  The question is a costing one....to G/L.  How did you adjust 
for the Inv bump in the G/L -  via rules.

Thanks,

jeff

> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:48:43 -0700
> From: dale_gindlesperger-/[email protected]
> To: mapics-l-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
> Subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] Inv transfer Question.
> 
> Hey Jeff, 
> 
> If you recall, we did that at FFT. You can have different costs in different 
> warehouses for the same items. I actually went the two sites way in EPDM so we 

> could have even better control. The parts in site 100, whse 1, was a 
> manufactured part, and in site 200, whse 2 the same part was a purchased part. 

> Worked very well.
> 
> Dale (Cork) Gindlesperger, CPIM 
> Click here for my professional profile
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Jeff Snyder <[email protected]>
> To: mapics midrange <mapics-l-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
> Sent: Tue, April 26, 2011 11:42:45 AM
> Subject: [MAPICS-L] Inv transfer Question.
> 
> 
> Hey Group,
> 
> I have an account that has 2 physical plants. They transfer some component 
> items from one to another. The issue is they would like to apply a different 
> cost to the component at the receiving facility to include the freight cost.
> We are discussing setting up 2 Sites (EPDM).
> 
> The question is we transfer the inventory from one to another, we do not sell 
> it. example: if the cost is 1.00 at the production location, Plant A and 1.25 
> at the receiving location, Plant B. (Std Cost).
> 
> When we transfer the component we can credit Plant A's inventory for 1.00 and 
> debit intransit for 1.00. (IW). What do we do when we receive at plant B? The 
> inventory will be received at 1.25 (RW).
> 
> We could debit the Inv account - plant B, and credit another intransit - in for 
>
> the 1.25. But how do we clear the delta at the end of the month between the 
> two intransit accounts? (.25)
> 
> I think we would need to clear these two accounts with a journal entry and the 

> delta hit an Inventory adjustment account. (add up IWs against RWs). 
> 
> 
> Any other thoughts?
> 
> Gathering info.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jeff 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MAPICS-L-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
> or email: MAPICS-L-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
> _______________________________________________
> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MAPICS-L-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
> or email: MAPICS-L-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
> 
                          
_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.