Re: which release should we goto.

James LeLeux <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.systems.as400.mapics
Message-ID <CANXhosJy=B9_vF=_DtMZfwdX+yxBPG=hh5=9Dv_VxMgK6-yuhw@mail.gmail.com>
Charlie,

I am in the process of converting to 9.0.  I started before the 9.1 was
supported by the migration programs. I hope to go live in a few weeks. From
what I could tell 9.1 was primarily a ION stepping stone, with a huge
prerequisite related to currencies.

I can't talk to the KBC issue as we don't have it, so it was not in my
research.

I like the Power architecture, but as always, I underestimated what it
would take to convert to get everything over to the new box.

The power needed to run all the new services should drive you to a new box,
not to mention user needs.  I was very happy with the price of the new box
- I think you and I have the same source for hardware.

Despite all the uncertainty I face regarding the future of MAPICS at my
facility, I pushed hard for 9 and would not settle for 7.8 that a sister
plant went to. I suggest you do the same, push for the latest, stabel
release!

Best of luck...james



On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Schisler, Charlie
<Cschisler-xzdMK9rnGehWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>wrote:

> To all
>
> I have a simple question that I think does not have a simple answer.  We
> are a small it department of 2, we need to upgrade our current release
> of MAPICS, the question is which release should we go to?  We have a
> large investment in KBC that we do not want to lose at this time.  we
> are currently at release 6. Does anyone have any suggestions on which
> release we should go to? Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
> Charles Schisler
>
> IT Manager
>
>
>
>
>
> www.elevatorequipment.com
>
> cschisler-xzdMK9rnGehWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
>
> phone 323.245.0147
>
>
>
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual
>
> or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in
> error please notify the system manager.
>
> Please note that any non-business related views or opinions presented in
> this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>
> represent those of EECO. The recipient should check this email and any
> attachments for the presence
>
> of viruses. EECO accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
> transmitted by this email. For your protection this Email
>
> has been scanned by a Barracuda Spam and Virus Firewall before
> transmission.
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MAPICS-L-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
> or email: MAPICS-L-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.