Re: R9 Migration to Client

Richard Stover <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.systems.as400.mapics
Message-ID <4E762C562CC5F446843E616E9A07F7D10720F232@uc2-exmbx02-n2.UC2.Chicago.Hostway>
May relate to Incident 5691609 having to do with business object export that you would get all public and private user definitions.

Best Regards

Richard (Dick) Stover
Consulting Manager 
Guide Technologies, LLC
A Gold Infor Channel Partner
215-499-8530
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Otto Meyn
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 10:10 AM
To: MAPICS ERP System Discussion
Subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] R9 Migration to Client

I have views that contain ONLY Item rev data, but did not migrate. An incidents(s) have been recorded.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dale Gindlesperger
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 3:29 PM
To: MAPICS ERP System Discussion
Subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] R9 Migration to Client

I believe that they come over OK if the views and such are based on Item Revision, but they are not migrated if you use Item.  Infor wants us to quit using Item Master and use Item Revision for all the PowerLink work.  Check out KB 1043095 for full detail, but here's a summary:

Views migrated to R9 that contained attributes from Item Master will be dropped if EPDM is installed
 
In R9, views over Item Warehouse cannot include attributes from the Item Master, even though they have a many-to-one relationship.
This is because of full EPDM enablment (R9). Even though item is considered part of the query scope in R9 (because of the many-to-1 relationship) the availability of the item master attributes is conditioned to be available only when PDM+ is installed.  And in R9, when EPDM is installed, PDM+ is assumed to not be installed ... per the Application window. Views migrated from a previous release will not contain the item master attributes. 

 
Resolution
Users will need to update their views to contain the equivalent attributes from the Item Revision file.  The views should then use the data from the current item revision.

If you are planning an R9.1 upgrade, I would strongly recommend going through all your custom stuff and change any use of Item to use Item Revision prior to doing the upgrade.

 
Dale (Cork) Gindlesperger, CPIM
Click here for my professional profile on LinkedIn

"If I'd asked my customers what they wanted, they'd have said a faster horse." - Henry Ford

A Pessimist Sees The Difficulty in Every Opportunity; An Optimist Sees The Opportunity in Every Difficulty; An Analyst Sees How to Achieve the Opportunity!





>________________________________
> From: Otto Meyn <[email protected]>
>To: MAPICS-L SUBMIT <[email protected]>
>Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 2:32 PM
>Subject: [MAPICS-L] R9 Migration to Client
> 
>The PowerLink views for Item revision and Item Balance did not migrate.
>I find the Item master file was dropped from any relationship BUT the 
>file is still listed in the
>
>Integrator.
>
>
>
>I can understand, maybe, the dropping of the relationship with the item 
>rev. BUT, the item balance, (warehouse), record's relationship with the 
>item rev is by item. We have multiple sites
>
>with the same item numbers.  The items are manufactured in one location 
>only. I see lots of problems if the warehouse records display item rev 
>data.
>
>
>
>Any comments?  Also, has anyone else find missing views, subset or 
>sorts after migrating to Release 9?
>
>
>
>I also know the price book offline loads will not work anymore, that's 
>a BIG OUCH for me.
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list To 
>post a message email: [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, 
>or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
>or email: [email protected] Before posting, please take a 
>moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list To post a message email: [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: [email protected]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.

_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list To post a message email: [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: [email protected]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.

_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: [email protected]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.