Re: Program object's USRPRF(*USER vs. *OWNER) effect onauthorities required to run certain things.

Dan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.systems.as400.security
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 11/11/05, John Earl <john.earl-Ua2wos9bJ7y1Z/[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > QUESTION: Do they really mean to imply the _user profile_
> > in effect at the
> > time the command is being executed, and not the signed-on
> > _user_?
>
> They mean the user profile _in_effect_. That means if you are using
> program profile adoption, then it is the combined authorities of the
> Signed on User and the Owner(s) of the adopting program(s) being
> executed.
>
> If you are using swapped profile, it is simply the authority of the
> "Current" user.


In our particular case, either way we are covered.

But I'm curious about the "swapped profile" comment. Are you referring to
the QSYGETPH and QWTSETP duo? Or something else?

- Dan
_______________________________________________
This is the Security Administration on the AS400 / iSeries (Security400) mailing list
To post a message email: Security400-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/security400
or email: Security400-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/security400.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.