Re: Web dev tools
Nathan Andelin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.systems.as400.web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACCOLZkcyX-MHvAMCykJdb-aD+1bxX4wSOa63TRpo4O+j9ScMA@mail.gmail.com> |
> > Statelessness is a requirement for Progressive Web Apps (PWAs). Greg, I wonder if you might clarify one point. When referring to PWAs, aren't you actually implementing stateful interfaces in the browser? If so, then aren't we in agreement that there are good reasons for implementing stateful interfaces? In regard to maintaining in-memory state, isn't it more of a question on whether to implement it in the client, or on the server, or both? I agree that there are valid use cases for maintaining state in browser memory, or cookies, or some client-based implementation. But what I don't get, is why the server side would need to be stateless? For example, you might want to maintain the state of SQL cursors and other database interfaces in memory for individual sessions, for individual users, for ease of coding and for improved performance. I think traditional "400 programmers" can relate to this. In regard to a discussion about tools, isn't the question more about whether the tool channels developers into one particular type of implementation or another, as opposed to having the flexibility of choosing the best interface for the application in question? -- This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing list To post a message email: [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400 or email: [email protected] Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at https://archive.midrange.com/web400.