Re: IWS, REST APIs, and Logging
Stephen Piland <Stephen-anE3zL/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.systems.as400.web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BN8PR04MB60513563C4E19D6DDFBDA5F7B0409@BN8PR04MB6051.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> |
Any thoughts on the timeline on this? Just curious. We've been on Version 2.6 for a long time. -----Original Message----- From: WEB400 <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Nadir Amra Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 12:59 PM To: Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [WEB400] IWS, REST APIs, and Logging When we implement logging of payloads, It will fail, but you would still have a log of the payload. "WEB400" <[email protected]> wrote on 04/27/2021 12:05:56 PM: > From: Jon Paris <[email protected]> > To: "Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries)" <[email protected]> > Date: 04/27/2021 12:06 PM > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [WEB400] IWS, REST APIs, and Logging > Sent by: "WEB400" <[email protected]> > > Yup - that could be useful I agree - although I suspect that IWS > would fail anyway while attempting the unpacking. > > > Jon Paris > > > On Apr 27, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Stephen Piland > <Stephen-anE3zL/[email protected]> wrote: > > > > True. I agree that it would diminish the value of IWS. I was > hoping that turning on some logging, etc would allow us to capture > the payload/body IF it was 'malformed' and it can't unpack into the > parameters. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: WEB400 <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jon Paris > > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 11:02 AM > > To: Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [WEB400] IWS, REST APIs, and Logging > > > > Well it kinda goes against the whole point of IWS which is to > avoid you having to concern your self with such issues. The payload > is unpacked into the parameters and vice-versa for you. > > > > If you really need to access the body why use IWS at all? > > > > > > > > Jon Paris > > > >> On Apr 27, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Stephen Piland > <Stephen-anE3zL/[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> I haven't seen any way to do this so far, but I thought I'd ask > the group... > >> > >> Is there any way to capture the 'payload'/body sent in? Ideally, > pre-execution of the program or service program call from within > IWS. If not, is there a way to capture it in the called pgm perhaps > as a BLOB that could be stored? > >> -- This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing list To post a message email: [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400 or email: [email protected] Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at https://archive.midrange.com/web400. -- This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing list To post a message email: [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400 or email: [email protected] Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at https://archive.midrange.com/web400.