Re: new mailing lists, notably ark-commits

Berto writes:

> IMHO, I suggest you not create too many specialized lists initially until
> traffic levels warrant them.  ...

Don't worry, I'm on your beam on this one...  If it's any
comfort, I sat behind the glasgow-haskell mailing lists for
six years; this is the part of the game I understand :-)

> Would ark-announce be a list that one voluntarily subscribes to, or would
> you (Will) have it be the union of all other lists?

I'm open to suggestion.  It could be ark-dev + ark-users +
others-who-subscribe-to-that-alone.  ark-commits people will
always be just a few gluttons for punishment, I presume. ???

Will