Re: configuring...
Matt Holgate <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.ark.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> For example, I'd be happy to see a GNU team that has as close to all of the
> GNU utilities listed in it. At some point, some other policy team decides
> whether or not the 'g' prefix needs to be added, or if all of the gnu
> utilities will be installed (deployed?) under /usr/local/gnu/ .
I can definitely see the merit of a "universal" team that contains the
things that are true, irrespective of whether you are using sidai or not.
For instance:
- how to compile and install a particular (GNU or other) package.
This procedure is package specific, but nothing really to do
with sidai. So, <compile>, <check>, <install> methods would be
in "universal", but <deploy>, <reveal> etc. would remain in
sidai
- the location of standard resources:
eg. universal/hosts/rhlinux.xml might contain
<sys-cc>/usr/bin/gcc</sys-cc>
with nonsidai/host/rhlinux.xml using this value:
<cc>@host:sys-cc</cc>
but sidai/hosts/rhlinux.xml still insists we use our own gcc:
<cc>
<constraint><dependency type="essential" name="gcc"/></constraint>
<string>/our/bin/gcc</string>
</cc>
This would hopefully ease the configuration problem.
So now, the prototype tree for gcc--2.95.2 might look like:
- myteam: gcc--2.95.2
- universal: gcc--2.95.2
- universal: gcc
- myteam: ALL
- sidai: ALL
Matt