Re: non-gcc dependency flags

Edward Moy writes:

> However, I would thing that fixing the "busted
> dependencyFlags" would be a useful future enhancement,
> particularly given the variety of unices out there.

I agree that the present deal is a wart/hack and should be
fixed.  (Not exactly sure when I'll get to it but...)

The simplest thing would be to pass dependencyFlags a
"compiler style" parameter, 'gcc' being one possible value.
Add more as needed.  Means that dependencyFlags becomes More
Horrible, but at least it's in one place.

Anyone care to object/barf :-?

Will


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn