Re: Question about API stability of autoconf-archive
Philip Withnall <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.archive-maintainers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 12:06 +0100, Peter Simons wrote: > Hi Philip, > > > What’s the API stability policy for autoconf-archive macros? Once a > > macro is in an autoconf-archive release, is it committed to API > > stability for ever, or is it free to break its API whenever it likes > > (subject to updating #serial)? > > our macros can change their API. Every reasonable person understands, of > course, that backwards compatibility shouldn't be broken lightly and it > happens rarely, but in the end there's no mechanism in place to guarantee > that a macro doesn't change its API. We do guarantee that every edit > triggers a bump of the #serial number, though. That’s very clear and reasonable, thanks. Perhaps this should be documented on the autoconf-archive website so people don’t ask in future? Thanks again for all your work on autoconf-archive. It’s brilliant. Philip
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 213 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EABEKAAYFAlTGJ1MACgkQ8JQuiUsur6CzYQD/cVejPU1+/b38VISLsRWpg+G+ yUnCs9m+yQJXaoab22YA/3G/Vv90sTfHiZsGAH915Jdh9Arz3lW2lxt3b+L8xn/W =E2i1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----