Re: Question about API stability of autoconf-archive

Philip Withnall <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.archive-maintainers
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 12:06 +0100, Peter Simons wrote:
> Hi Philip,
> 
>  > What’s the API stability policy for autoconf-archive macros? Once a
>  > macro is in an autoconf-archive release, is it committed to API
>  > stability for ever, or is it free to break its API whenever it likes
>  > (subject to updating #serial)?
> 
> our macros can change their API. Every reasonable person understands, of
> course, that backwards compatibility shouldn't be broken lightly and it
> happens rarely, but in the end there's no mechanism in place to guarantee
> that a macro doesn't change its API. We do guarantee that every edit
> triggers a bump of the #serial number, though.

That’s very clear and reasonable, thanks. Perhaps this should be
documented on the autoconf-archive website so people don’t ask in
future?

Thanks again for all your work on autoconf-archive. It’s brilliant.

Philip
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 213 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iF4EABEKAAYFAlTGJ1MACgkQ8JQuiUsur6CzYQD/cVejPU1+/b38VISLsRWpg+G+
yUnCs9m+yQJXaoab22YA/3G/Vv90sTfHiZsGAH915Jdh9Arz3lW2lxt3b+L8xn/W
=E2i1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.