Re: Various issues with AX_DIST_RPM
Thomas Petersen <[email protected]> Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:12:23 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.archive-maintainers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kip Warner schrieb: >> I am trying to use AX_DIST_RPM in my project to make it easy to build >> rpm packages but doing so I have encountered various issues. > This doesn't really answer your question, but is a gentle suggestion in > another direction. I'd encourage you to not make your build environment > (e.g. Autoconf and Automake) depend on distro specific packaging tools, > but keep them separate. Thank you for your comments. I agree it would be prettier to have those distro specific things isolated in subdirectories as you suggest. I guess I just try out this macro as it seemed to be an easy way to build a rpm package. Using the macro doesn't really make the project depend on this specific packaging tool. It's still an optional feature that is available if rpm is present. The program still compiles and installs as usual (make && make install) if rpm is not present. Anyway I have put a patch on the patch tracker (#9550) with my suggestions to improving ax_dist_rpm. Your comments are welcome. Regards, Thomas Petersen
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQSm9PlL7jdQ8fZh4wk5oLo3rRPuvAUCWmdQ2AAKCRA5oLo3rRPu vAQFAKCALMhz6BpFc21f1lINgRkfOo4NJgCgr6DtP4SOT3gdKM7fN+8PHB7Zov8= =V/lY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----