Re: autoreconf --force seemingly does not forcibly update everything

Bernhard Voelker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs,gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 4/1/24 11:54 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
 > Last month, I spent 2 days on prerelease testing of coreutils. If, after
 > downloading the carefully prepared tarball from ftp.gnu.org, the first
 > thing a distro does is to throw away the *.m4 files and regenerate the
 > configure script with their own one,
 >    * It shows [...]

FWIW: especially the downstream builds of the 'coreutils' package have been
using 'autoreconf -fi' for a long time, because the upstream tools do not
have full I18N support, and the large I18N patch is in use e.g. at Fedora,
openSUSE and Debian probably since >15 years.
Nowadays, the coreutils-i18n.patch [1][2] gets smaller and smaller because
upstream is adding I18N step by step in one tool or another.
But we're still not there yet, unfortunately.

[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/coreutils/blob/main/f/coreutils-i18n.patch
[2]
https://build.opensuse.org/projects/openSUSE:Factory/packages/coreutils/files/coreutils-i18n.patch?expand=1

Have a nice day,
Berny
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.