Re: ac_cv_sys_largefile_opts undocumented?
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.bugs,gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Zi1-isQLshe40cwi@hilbert> |
On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 02:26:24PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 2024-04-27 14:06, [email protected] wrote: > > Thus I got questions whether a patch for a build system I submitted for > > a project is OK, as it uses an undocumented variable (thus, perhaps, > > unstable). > > Although it's poorly designed and not documented and not stable, the > patch may be good anyway. What's the patch for? It's for nauty, a well-known program to deal with graph isomorphisms etc. I've made a Gentoo patch here https://bugs.gentoo.org/921138 and I wanted to upstream it. Dima
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEJVdDnfI7raAa4RJxoksLHjfJBTEFAmYtfooACgkQoksLHjfJ BTFbhwf9FJ7QqM7EV9tlH1XsWu+HThjf/wwIRkAC00JJ7q++Jf/p4ZxcLM9gmEkU qX6PRGKm3TODPhgq6iLgJqmh30wuM7tZhlo9pV/0ftxIgNaOtHXgt/54j6ykTje0 lhRpSK7ubXmR+Ap2rG2/vR8hhlcE71aDaQ0Xo/xqPgoisWl68DOpao3CgeATinE/ utzEUTYt5gr6ESDn7oZ75Oo4YoQRSarJOEpJUxMEfK8SfMJiDhuhG583Y+JBKN2Y GqmCBhIAISNipCrWUDezKYToD5fCH++QUEEX5ptRcFlXhEW4DBG1tsOolaFTBM+u zDI8SlzWC1ZL98ge36Ng/bf4+kd/wg== =NqGb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----