Re: fedora 42 doesn't have awk: how to deal with autoconf subst?
pluto--- via Bug reports for autoconf <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Apr 2025 21:19:45 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <68032461.mUzrbgMcSzVaNVzI%[email protected]> |
James Cloos <[email protected]> wrote: > should the scripts also check for 'busybox awk' in $PATH? Do they check for other commands that way? It should not be necessary, unless we want to allow for a busybox that is installed strangely.