Re: Option doesn't work properly when backporting to version 2.69

test.sh.in:
#/bin/bash
ls @runstatedir@

configure.ac:
# Taken from http://www.idryman.org/blog/2016/03/10/autoconf-tutorial-1/
# Must init the autoconf setup
# The first parameter is project name
# second is version number
# third is bug report address
AC_INIT([test], [1.0])

# We want to expand templates in this file
AC_CONFIG_FILES([test.sh])
# Store the auxiliary build tools (e.g., install-sh, config.sub, config.guess)
# in this dir (build-aux)
AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([build-aux])

# Generate the output
AC_OUTPUT


On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 12:12 PM Ondrej Dubaj <[email protected]> wrote:

> When backporting the given commit to version 2.69:
>
>
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/autoconf.git/commit/?id=a197431414088a417b407b9b20583b2e8f7363bd
>
> we are experiencing problems with behaviour in Fedora.
>
> In the documentation there is: By default runstatedir is a subdirectory of ${localstatedir},
> but it doesn't behave in such a way. The expectation was that after setting
>
> --localstatedir=/dirA
>
> will it change also @runstatedir@ to /dirA/run. But @runstatedir@ changes always to /run.
>
> Steps to Reproduce:
>     1. run autoreconf --verbose --install --force
>     2. mkdir /tmp/run/
>     3. touch /tmp/run/file1
>     4. ./configure --localstatedir=/tmp
>     5. ./test.sh
> Actual results:
> list /run
>
> Expected results:
> list /tmp/run
>
> test.sh.in:
>
> *#/bin/bashls @runstatedir@*
>
> configure.ac:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *# Taken from http://www.idryman.org/blog/2016/03/10/autoconf-tutorial-1/ <http://www.idryman.org/blog/2016/03/10/autoconf-tutorial-1/># Must init the autoconf setup# The first parameter is project name# second is version number# third is bug report addressAC_INIT([test], [1.0])# We want to expand templates in this fileAC_CONFIG_FILES([test.sh])# Store the auxiliary build tools (e.g., install-sh, config.sub, config.guess)# in this dir (build-aux)AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([build-aux])# Generate the outputAC_OUTPUT*
>
> Is there anything missing in the applied patch adding runstatedir option ?
>
> Thanks for cooperation.
>
> Red Hat developers
>
>