Re: Detect if the static keyword is supported in array type derivations in function parameters
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Dec 2025 08:55:08 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | UCLA Computer Science Department |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2025-12-15 08:14, Antonin D=C3=A9cimo wrote: > Using static or an at_least macro is being discussed right now for the > Linux kernel; LWN reports on it. >=20 > _Checked-size array parameters in C_, By Jonathan Corbet, December 1, = 2025 > https://lwn.net/Articles/1046840/ Yes, there's been quite a discussion of that on the Gnulib front as=20 well. See the thread "function parameters of array type" starting here: https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gnulib/2025-12/threads.html#00092 This is a messy situation overall, and it may be better for Autoconf to=20 wait for the dust to settle.