Re: [PATCH] docs: mention $MAKE during configure

Stefano Lattarini <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.patches,gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 01/03/2013 10:54 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Based on a suggestion from Bob Friesenhahn:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2013-01/msg00017.html
> 
> * doc/install.texi (Defining Variables): Mention that MAKE
> can be overridden, and the caveats that come with setting it.
> ---
> 
> How does this look?
> 
>  doc/install.texi | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/install.texi b/doc/install.texi
> index 4c2ffb5..bb08786 100644
> --- a/doc/install.texi
> +++ b/doc/install.texi
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> 
>  @unnumbered Installation Instructions
> 
> -Copyright @copyright{} 1994-1996, 1999-2002, 2004-2012 Free Software
> +Copyright @copyright{} 1994-1996, 1999-2002, 2004-2013 Free Software
>  Foundation, Inc.
> 
>  Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification, are
> @@ -371,6 +371,14 @@ Defining Variables
>  CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/bash ./configure CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/bash
>  @end example
> 
> +Another variable to be aware of is @env{MAKE}; many packages allow this
> +to be set during @command{configure} in order to request the use of an
> +alternative @command{make} implementation (such as GNU make, which is
> +often present as @command{gmake}).  However, once an alternative is
> +chosen, the resulting Makefile may no longer work with the generic
> +@command{make}, so you must make sure to consistently use your
> +alternative make.
> +
s/make/@command{make}/?

Apart from that possible nit, ACK from me.

Thanks,
  Stefano
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.