Re: [PATCH] Revert 'Fix logic error in _AC_PROG_LEX_YYTEXT_DECL (#109320)'

Zack Weinberg <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.patches
Message-ID <CAKCAbMjaSAMthDiv6knjDbgzeqn5qaQ0Cuc7rO0_3Q4a-2dyAA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 2:47 PM Ross Burton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 19:41, Zack Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Can we slow down a bit please?  I had written out a patch (basically
> > equivalent to what's now in trunk) and I am in the process of setting
> > up a cross-compilation environment to validate the fix for certain,
> > but this is going to take several hours.
> >
> > I believe that what's in trunk now should work fine for
> > cross-compilation of programs that don't require yywrap, even if there
> > is no target libfl, even for source tarballs that don't ship lex.yy.c,
> > as long as the flex program is available in the build environment.  If
> > that's not the scenario you're talking about, Ross, please clarify,
> > but I don't see how a tarball that doesn't ship the generated scanner
> > could ever have worked with no flex at all.
>
> Build-testing current master now. Will report back later: I love Yocto
> but it is annoying to work on something like autoconf as that causes a
> toolchain rebuild...

Thanks for testing.  I will proceed with my own tests in parallel.

I pushed another change but it just revises the manual section for
AC_PROG_LEX some more.

zw
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.