Re: [PATCH] doc: clarify integer requirements in some functions
Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> Sun, 13 Feb 2022 01:41:21 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <YgioERjgni9mAA9D@vapier> |
On 12 Feb 2022 14:55, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 2/12/22 01:03, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i > > don't think, based on the description of AS_VAR_ARITH, this is unreasonable: > > blah=2 > > AS_VAR_ARITH([foo], [$blah + 0.1]) > > True enough. I installed the attached, which is a bit fancier than what > you proposed, and which nails down more details about AS_VAR_ARITH. thanks, lgtm -mike
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEuQK1JxMl+JKsJRrUQWM7n+g39YEFAmIIqBEACgkQQWM7n+g3 9YFfIA//Xcnyk66Sf/py/q6HNOXz4tM2yYTmfzp/XpGwLK3p4LlZP1gxtBdzWTgG czX/lEAtIs9RFaJS9Mt0Womh5Cbpr0z6XxstgaFGrYeS/dlpOdSLGY2H829fEaf1 XihKkj+7JP4H4t7i5Epxr3/VYUvfKi83VDPWVqmueGJHl78Kp+MaI+/WUFBhXLYC 08AlqZBzmwqjiUed9bXJik974RTF7lnU5/r8TF5EzXS5viZa204Gmdy+pWbo3GtO 4pca/rn4txqVBTuC4fQ2735H53A4qK7uMjh+dM4TQY5UMHZ/f75RsbfWZLS4i1OL LMuW9sZN4zInXsq7j6e2uT2mxb66UO8laWhEntR5upasFkCbI15QkDGtOc9ZHrkY nWgDICt+858rIAnqNRMuDj6DTMtHxi8QuuE+Gd/b3ry5bVaCygkU5zO2MpJviTci LmTE3/nl+gA2eEwLpNNRUHchXOOPQReM3/a5D8qb1j2th2zF338d7zj1DHTt7VHH MZP1xWymWm3EZslRwYFLckKxRtiub2LXTN3kSadI481YL5fS3R/eUzs/cJQJlcTR K08o+2siildGiPryFUScgG86DSMjlAngVp/tmRBjAxjVbfBPykVZ2kSvx3sIlG6C WeA5D1ZnmVIt6Ij4xlZ85dnVmopnBBpaqtEr3//aGzqzaOt+EXs= =dcDA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----