Re: Problems building rsync with Clang 15 beta

Paul Eggert <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Aug 2022 09:51:51 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.patches,gmane.network.rsync.general
Organization UCLA Computer Science Department
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/18/22 09:38, Khem Raj wrote:
> I think the autoconf patch should be good on its own merits regardless

It partly depends on how much we care about compatibility. Putting the 
'void' in there will break pre-C89 compilers, as well as C++ compilers 
pretending (badly) to be C compilers. I doubt whether we care about the 
former any more, but the latter might be an issue.


> there were few other package
> builds which started to succeed after this change in autoconf

Which ones, exactly, and why?